A Tale of Two Markets: Nippon Steel’s Retreat from China and its Acquisition of U.S. Steel
What factors underpinned Nippon Steel Corporation’s contrasting strategic initiatives in China and the U.S. to enhance its global competitiveness, and how did political and market challenges impact its pursuit of a major acquisition in the U.S.?
At a glance
Origin
Japan
Year Formed
1970
Industry
Steel
Revenue
USD57.8 billion
(as of FY 2023)
Abstract
Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), Japan's leading steelmaker and the fourth-largest globally, faced contrasting strategic dynamics in the Chinese and U.S. markets. This case study examines NSC’s retreat from its 20-year joint venture with China’s Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., prompted by declining market share in China due to two primary factors: overcapacity in the Chinese automotive market and the rapid transition toward electric vehicles (EVs). Concurrently, NSC sought to enhance its global competitiveness by acquiring U.S. Steel, aiming to increase its crude steel capacity and reinforce its footprint in a key market aligned with the U.S.’s "friendshoring" strategy.
While NSC’s exit from China reflects the complexities of shifting market conditions and competitive pressures, its U.S. expansion underscores an ambitious pursuit of growth amidst geopolitical and regulatory hurdles. The proposed acquisition encountered stiff opposition from labor unions, political figures, and regulators, including concerns over national security and job security. This case highlights NSC’s strategic challenges and decisions, exploring the broader implications of its focus on market adaptability, zero-carbon steelmaking innovation, and supply chain integration. By analyzing NSC’s approaches in these two pivotal markets, the study encourages learners to evaluate corporate strategies in the face of global political and economic complexities.
Cover Photo: Nikkei Asia
All rights reserved. © 2025 Nikkei Business Lab Asia. No part of this publication may be copied, stored, or transmitted in any form. Copying or posting is an infringement of copyright.
Disclaimers:
(1) Regarding Case Study Content: This case study is based mainly on secondary data and analysis of publicly available information unless otherwise stated, and is intended solely for educational purposes. Any opinions expressed by the author(s) are designed to facilitate learning discussion and do not serve to illustrate the effectiveness of the company. Additionally, banner images and logos used in the case study are intended for visualization in an educational setting and it is not used to represent or brand the company. For any dispute regarding the content and usage of images and logos, please contact the team.
(2) Regarding University Affiliation and Titles of Authors: The university affiliation and titles of author(s) seen in the case study is based on their affiliation and title during the time of publication. It may or may not represent the current status of said author(s).