U.S. Investment Bank in Japan – Currency Risk Management in Foreign Branch Relocations
Foreign exchange volatility risks driving a U.S. bank's Tokyo expansion severely over budget. Which treasury strategy will you pitch to shield your operational capital?
At a glance
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Funding Currency
USD (US$)
Operational Currency
JPY (Yen)
Exchange Rate
1 USD = 155 JPY
(as of July 2024)
Abstract
Horizon Global Financial, a fictional U.S. investment bank, faces significant currency risk as it relocates its Tokyo branch amid heightened USD/JPY volatility. The bank’s fixed relocation budget must cover expenses denominated in Japanese Yen while critical technology infrastructure is purchased from U.S. vendors in U.S. Dollars, creating substantial exposure to unfavorable exchange rate movements.
This case study places learners in the role of the Head of Tokyo Operations, responsible for evaluating the branch’s foreign exchange exposure and recommending a treasury strategy to protect the remaining project budget. The case examines how interest rate divergence between Japan and the United States contributed to sustained Japanese Yen (JPY) depreciation and illustrates the potential financial impact of an unhedged U.S. Dollar (USD) commitment on technology procurement.
Designed as a problem-solving case study for corporate finance and managerial economics students, the case emphasizes the strategic trade-off between capital efficiency and risk certainty while requiring learners to justify their preferred treasury strategy under uncertain future exchange rate conditions.
Keywords: Foreign Exchange Risk Management, Currency Risk Management, USD/JPY, Exchange Rate Risk, Currency Hedging, Treasury Risk Management, Foreign Exchange, Hedging Strategies, Derivatives Hedging, Money Market Hedge, Corporate Treasury Strategy, Capital Budget Risk Management
Cover Photo by Qing Luo
All rights reserved. © 2026 Nikkei Business Lab Asia. No part of this publication may be copied, stored, or transmitted in any form. Copying or posting is an infringement of copyright.
Disclaimers:
(1) Regarding Case Study Content: This case study is based mainly on secondary data and analysis of publicly available information unless otherwise stated, and is intended solely for educational purposes. Any opinions expressed by the author(s) are designed to facilitate learning discussion and do not serve to illustrate the effectiveness of the company. Additionally, banner images and logos used in the case study are intended for visualization in an educational setting and it is not used to represent or brand the company. For any dispute regarding the content and usage of images and logos, please contact the team.
(2) Regarding University Affiliation and Titles of Authors: The university affiliation and titles of author(s) seen in the case study is based on their affiliation and title during the time of publication. It may or may not represent the current status of said author(s).
